Clarifying user intent

I think it would be wise to ask a clarifying question first: does the user want confirmation, a source link, a summary, implications, or a translation to English? Their message suggests they might need some verification, so a concise response might be asking if they want a source check or summary. Given network sandboxing limitations, it's better to clarify what they need before proceeding. We can provide context about wage structures and rumors but should avoid asserting specifics.Analyzing wage structures

I'll provide a general analysis focused on wages and amortization. Napoli has a wage cap, and their president enforces wage discipline, meaning they rarely pay top wages. Mainoo, being under a long-term contract with Manchester United, would likely be valued highly, making a deal unlikely. The term [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;冻结[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; might just refer to rumors.

If the user wants, I can retrieve and translate the original piece from Corriere dello Sport, but this may involve network requirements. I should respond concisely in Chinese, like this:

\n

• 核验消息的可靠性、查原文、或做解读？
• 快评：Napoli的工资结构和控薪过程，Mainoo的续约情况。
• 下一步选项。

\n